The Vagaries of Viagra, or, What Won't Men Do for Sex?
So it's come to this. Having sex is more important to men than being able to see.
I exaggerate.
For now.
The FDA is looking into some rare reports of blindness in users of Viagra and Cialis, two of the three male impotence drugs. The drug companies, to their credit, already had posted warnings about possible visual side effects because many of the men taking these drugs did so because their impotence was caused by other, high-risk conditions. Blurry or blue-tinged vision, however, is not the same as not being able to see at all.
Viagra certainly doesn't need any more problems in the wake of revelations that it has had Medicaid paying for prescriptions for sex offenders. What I want to know is: who are the doctors who prescribed these drugs in the first place?? And if they're not to blame, why don't we have some safeguards in place so that men who have done serious damage when they do get it up, aren't aided in potentially doing so again?
While I'm digressing, let's talk about the irony of a society so testerone-charged that sex is used to sell everything, but it's still considered "wrong," "dirty," or "over-the-top" to see a man nude. I'm not talking about an ass cheek here or there; I'm talking Full Frontal.
What's the big deal, guys? I'll admit the female form is generally more pleasing to look at, but what have you got to hide? You're so obssessed with looking good that you've got steroids, "male enhancement" drugs, hair coloring and hair restorers, and designer lines of skin care products just for men. The funny thing is, it's an accepted part of our society that men grow "distinguished" as they grow older. Paul Newman and Sean Connery are still considered sexy. When was the last time anyone said the same of Elizabeth Taylor or Zsa Zsa Gabor?
So what is it you're afraid of, guys? That when it comes down to it, your sex is all you have to offer? Come on, quit hiding.
I mean, you're using Viagra, right?

